Skip to content

Struthio camelus syriacus

warning Regionally Extinct
RE

The Arabian Ostrich (Middle Eastern subspecies Struthio camelus syriacus) is classified as globally Extinct in the Wild (EW). Extinction in Israel occurred in the early 20th century and since then no nesting attempts have been observed. In the previous edition of the Red Book (2002), it was classified as Extinct in the Wild (EW).
RE Current Regional Assessment | EX Previous Regional Assessment | Global Assessment

Habitats Shrubland, Desert Plains, Acaicia Savanna
Presence In Israel Resident
Breeding In Israel Bred in the past
Migration Types Nomad
Zoographical Zones Irano-Turanian, Saharo-Arabian, Sudani
Landscape Types Plains & Valleys, Wide Wadis
Vegetation Types Steppe, Herbaceous
Vegetation Densities Low
Nest Locations Ground
Diet Types Generalist
Foraging Grounds Ground
Body Sizes Large (over 1000g)
Threat Factors Nest Harvesting, Hunting and trapping

The Arabian Ostrich is the largest living bird on earth today. Its body length is about two meters and it weighs about 150 kg. It has small wings relative to its body size, and does not fly, but uses its wings to make sharp stops and turns when running. It is an omnivore feeding on grass, seeds, insects and small vertebrates. Its current distribution area is restricted to Africa.

Until the early 20th century, the Arabian Ostrich was found in the Negev, although its exact population size is unknown. It apparently occupied steppe and grassy areas in the Northern Negev, the Jordan Valley, the Judean Lowlands and the Coastal Plain. The last individuals were hunted during the 1920s and the last record was of an individual captured and sold alive in the Be’er Sheva area in 1929 (Hardy 1946). An ancient nest, 5,000 years old was found in Tel Mikhal near Herzliya, evidence of the existence of the species in central Israel in the distant past (Paz 1986, Shirihai 1996).

The Arabian Ostrich inhabited open landscapes in steppe and desert areas.

Arabian Ostriches of the subspecies Struthio camelus camelus were brought to the Yotvata Hai Bar in 1973 to establish a breeding nucleus. The ostriches reproduced successfully but the reintroduction efforts failed and the birds did not survive for long in nature.

The Arabian Ostrich of the subspecies S. c. syriacus became extinct by the 1940s (Cramp & Simons 1977). In Israel, it became extinct earlier during the 1920s. The reasons for extinction were hunting and collecting; some of the birds were sold in markets and kept as farm animals.

  • פז, ע. 1986. עופות. מתוך אלון, ע. (עורך), החי והצומח של ארץ ישראל. כרך 6. הוצאת משרד הביטחון, ישראל.
  • Cramp, S and Simmons, R.G. 1977. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Volume 1. Oxford University Press
  • Shirihai, H., 1996. The Birds of Israel. Academic Press, London.
  • Symes, A. 2013. Species generation lengths. Unpublished, BirdLife International.
  • Species page at Birdlife International

Distribution maps

The maps presented here provide visual information on the distribution of species in Israel from the past and present, and the changes in occupancy and breeding density during the comparison period. For further reading


Relative Abundance 2010-2020

Breeding density values in the current decade as determined from experts' opinion and observations from databases.

Relative Abundance 2010-2020 by density
Data Missing Sporadic Limited Sites Low Density High Density
8 12 12 21 19

Relative Abundance 1980-1990

Density values based primarily on the book The Birds of Israel (Shirihai 1996).

Relative Abundance 1980-1990 by density
Data Missing Sporadic Limited Sites Low Density High Density
5 14 14 17 22

Occupancy 1990-2020

The map shows differences in the species breeding distribution between the 1980's breeding map and the current weighted breeding evaluation. Negative value - species previously bred in the grid and is not presently breeding; positive value - species has not previously bred in the grid and is currently breeding.

Occupancy 1990-2020
Data Missing No Change Occupancy Increase Occupancy Decrease
6 35 1 9

Change in Relative Abundance 1990-2020

The map shows the changes in the relative abundance of a species in each of the distribution grids between the breeding map of the 1980s and the weighted current breeding evaluation. Negative values - decline in abundance; positive values - increase in abundance; zero - no change in abundance.

Change in Relative Abundance 1990-2020
80 to 100 50 20 to 30 No Change 30- to 20- 50- 100- to 80- Data Missing
0 4 2 22 12 14 11 16

Rarity
Vulnerability
Attractiveness
Endemism
Red number
Peripherality
IUCN category
Threat Definition according to the red book
() districts
Disjunctiveness:
% of protected sites

Other Species

Aquila fasciata
Gypaetus barbatus
Torgos tracheliotus
Clanga clanga